Which of the following best describes a consequence of deliberate evasion?

The choice that conveys a consequence of deliberate evasion is the heightened risk of application denial. Deliberate evasion in the context of immigration applications refers to the intentional act of providing misleading information or failing to disclose important facts. Engaging in such behavior undermines the integrity of the application process and can raise serious red flags for immigration officials.

When applicants withhold essential information or attempt to deceive the authorities, they typically find that their applications are scrutinized more closely, leading to a higher likelihood of denial. Immigration officials are trained to identify inconsistencies and signs of fraud, and once they detect deliberate evasion, it can significantly impact their decision-making process.

In contrast, enhanced trust, streamlined processing, and increased authority in legal matters are not plausible outcomes of engaging in deceptive practices. Trust from immigration officials is built on honesty and transparency, and the other options suggest positive consequences that are not typical in cases of deliberate evasion.